Tuesday, November 4, 2008

For Love of a Man 7 'A Special Purchase'

As I walked out of the coffee shop, I knew it was time to let John come home. If you have been reading the blog, you know that we had a difficult, but very frank conversation. While most of the feelings of anger had passed, I still felt a very real sense of hurt and betrayal. At lest by now I did know enough about dominance, submission, and things in between that I could have an intelligent conversation with John.



Yes, from talking with Tara, my new friend Liz, and the men in the studio; I had a very good sense of what John needed to be content with life. He needed a wife that would dominate him, and at times become his dominatrix. This meant major changes in the way John and I related to each other. In the coffee shop I told him that he would be something of a slave husband. I told him that if he came home I expected total obedience. He would have no control over money and very little personal freedom. I simply asked him if he could live this way on an ongoing basis. Without a second thought he answered 'yes mistress.' That was the first time he called me mistress.



When he finished speaking I told him that I didn't want his answer today. I told him to think about it over the next week, and meet me back in the coffee shop the following weekend. I told him that if he wanted to live as a slave husband, and if I felt he was sincere, he could come home with me the following Saturday. The smile on John's face left me with absolutely no doubt that he was willing to become my slave. Deep down, that is what he had always wanted.



While I was ready to let John back into the house, I was not ready to let him back into my bed.
In the studio we often used a kennel as a training tool, or as simply a place to put a man when you needed to get him out of the way. It was a very powerful training tool. In the studio the man always has superior physical strength over the dominatrix that is handling him. However, once locked inside the kennel, the female holds all of the power, and the male has none. Any authority he may have due to his physical strength is lost once inside the locked kennel.

Aside from the loss of any type of power, being locked in the kennel comes with an acute sense of humiliation. It was during my first week working with Tara that she suggested locking me in the kennel. She told me that the kennel was a very strong experience for the guys, and the only way I could really understand it was to spend just a little time locked in the cage. Before I knew what was happening, I found my self crawling into the small opening, and watching Tara press the lock closed. She then left me along in the room. I have never felt so helpless in all of my life. I thought what if she doesn't come back. There was no way I could ever free my self from the inside.

It was also humiliating to be down on my hands and knees waiting for rescue. Tara checked on me once during the hour or so I was in the kennel. Instead of letting me out her, she sent her husband in with the key. Having a man see me locked in the kennel only added to my feeling of total humiliation. He stood just behind the kennel watching my 'rear end' as I crawled out of the little door on my hands and knees. I thought it must be such a nice treat for him to watch. Tara then asked him he he enjoyed watching we crawl out. As he answered, 'yes mistress', she just laughed. She then sent him from the room. We talked. She asked me how I felt about the experience. I told her it was the most humiliating experience of my life. The experience did help me understand the value of a kennel as training tool, and as a punishment tool for the male.



One of things that I made John understand was that our 'fem/dom' relationship was going to be real. It was not going to be a game. As part of this John was going to be sleeping in a kennel, not in a bed with mistress. Upon coming home the second command John learned to obey was 'kennel up'. Upon receiving this command he was to immediately walk to the kennel, crawl in, and snap the lock closed. He understood that spending time locked in a kennel was just a part of being a slave husband. It was never for him to understand why mistress wanted him in the kennel, it was just for him to obey when commanded. Love, Mistress Kathy

26 comments:

Anonymous said...

It puts the lotion on his skin.

Anonymous said...

Your idea of dominance comes from a place of revenge and fear, not love or care. Get counseling.

Anonymous said...

Ms. Kathy...I'm not sure I understand the size of the kennel. Does it's size require that the occupant kneel at all times or is he able to lay down and stretch out and sleep?

When my wife gets tired of me she sometimes has me spend the night "in the closet" which simply means that I am to sleep in a coat closet (which is not locked). It is quite humiliating (especially with all of the coats and sweaters hanging there) and I would never come out without permission, but I think I can understand the power of and corresponding forfeiture of power when a lock is used.

It's great to see you back.
George

Anonymous said...

@George how do the coats an sweaters add to the humiliation.

I would be interested in knowing since I am always looking for new and exciting ways to humiliate my husband and I have a lot of coats and sweaters too!

Please let me know how this combination works!

Thanks!

Anonymous said...
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

Women are inferior.

Back to the kitchen with you!

Anonymous said...

there is no such thing as a "loving" dominant relationship. if you and your husband had a truly genuine, meaningful and healthy relationship you would be equals. another thing is that your dominance is really just a lie. your husband has turned the act of being dominated into a bizarre fetish. he gives you the control, you don't actually have it yourself. he allows you to treat him this way, so there really is no control involved.

Anonymous said...

Its true, you have no control at all. There is only the illusion of having it via you fulfilling your husbands inferiority fetish. well dones for trying.

Anonymous said...

Dear Kathy,

I do hope that these pathetic comments from ignorant males does not cause you to close your wonderful blog.

Verity

Anonymous said...

Ditto Verity,

It sounds like Ms. Kathy's detractors ae trying to convince themselves of something they know isn't true.

Otherwise, why are they here? What are they looking for?

Why don't they just go elsewhere?

Equality is the real fantasy. It can never truly be achieved. And the expectation of it often leaves one resentful, bitter, and unfulfilled.

JKL

Anonymous said...

Mistress Kathy,

It is obvious that femdom isn't for everyone. But I wonder why some people feel so threatened by it that they come here to attack the idea rather than just ignoring the website.

Why can't people just adapt a live and let live attitude?

Ultimately, the partners in a D/s relationship are as "equal" as the partners in a "normal" relationship because the submissive willingly submits and the dominant expresses her love through her dominance.

But any outside observer who presumes to say that there is can be no real love in a D/s relationship is going on mere prejudice. Only the participants in that relationship know what they feel.

Of course, some people try to tear down what others have out of bitterness for what they lack themselves.

darryl

Widgets said...

Kathy & Daryl:
This is the reason why the country is in so much trouble. We feel what goes on in our relationship is only ours and those we wish to talk about it with business. If we minded our own business and only commented to like minded people the country would be progressing instead of doing what it is regressing.
The Widgets

Anonymous said...

@Widgets
What country are you speaking of?
Last I checked she posted "her business" online, not in a particular country.

Anonymous said...

Widgets, you're suggesting we only talk to like minded people?

How is that going to improve relationships with people who think differently. Stop being so close minded.

Jake said...

Kathy,

I love your blog. Hopefully one day I'll be fortunate to be in a relationship as profound and fulfilling as yours.

Sincerely,
Jake

bud said...

Mistress Kathy:

Keep up the good work. Don't even listen or respond to the troublemakers. Delete their comments.

This is your blog, it is under your guidance. The content and direction are completely yours. It does not have to be a free for all.

If they have opinions on FLR they can start their own blogs.

Keep it real, keep it yours, keep having fun with it and kick the troublemakers to the curb.

Herbuddy

Liz's bill said...

Mistress Kathy,

Earlier this week i read Your last post and saw some of the negative comments. As others have said, please don't let a few insensitive individuals who don't understand our "world" deter You from future posts. There are many of us who welcome, appreciate and NEED You to continue.

Like George i have more questions for You (if You will be so kind as to answer them) about the kennel. Until You first mentioned the kennel in one of Your early posts, i had never considered the idea of such a punishment(and thankfully neither has my Wife/Mistress, Liz). Consequently, being an engineer, i am having a hard time grasping how it works in real life.

How big is the kennel? From what You tell us, it doesn't appear to be very big; just large enough to crawl into. However, i thought i remember You previously telling us that John was able to stand up. Was he able to? Was there room to move around a little or so small that the tops and sides basically would touch his body at all times?

How did You prevent masturbation (which i am sure You would not allow)?

It also sounds like he had to sleep in the kennel overnight. Was he allowed a pillow, small blanket? A naked body would definitely become chilled while asleep, so my guess he was given some type of cover. Am i wrong?

How often would you check on him? Allow him to go to the bathroom?

My apologies if i have asked too many questions and overstepped by rights as a slave.

Liz's bill

rowcoco said...

Dear Mistress Kathy,

Your blog seems to have caught the attention of some males who are scared to death of the changes that started long ago. The inevitable change from a paternal society to a maternal society is happening very quickly and completely. It has to be scary for the boys who can no longer rely on the sole source of their perceived power - the fact that they were born male.

Please don't let it deter you from posting. Your thoughts and experiences are invaluable. More then ever, the world (and especially, in my opinion, strong women) need to stand up against the ignorance and fear shown in those posts. Given the numbers of women versus men graduating with advanced degrees in college this is surely to be a moot point in the very near future but I believe that it's people like you that are changing society and moving us from a restrictive paternal society to a more common sense maternal one.

Anonymous said...

To the poster who asked what I felt was humiliating about being in a coat closet amongst coats and sweaters, I'm sorry if I didn't explain properly. Basically, it is a fairly cluttered closet (as I suppose many closets are) with coats, sweaters ponchos, etc. hanging up and boots, sneakers, etc. on the floor. this particular closet is under a stair case and the ceiling of it is not very high. I find it fairly humiliating to be sent to this place where there really isn't room for me among all of the things in there and if I want to stand I find myself half-crouched with a sweater or jacket in my face. If I sit, which I usually do, I am no better off as the floor is gritty from all of the dirt from the boots and shoes (and when my rear end is naked, this is not enjoyable -- yes I suppose the case could be made that if *I* had done a better job of cleaning and straightening the closet I wouldn't be in such a situation). This is certainly not a "web fantasy" type of humiliation, for me it not my favorite place. I hope this helps...but, as I mentioned in the earlier comment not having a lock on the door does takes away that power exchange that Ms. Kathy refers to.

Secondly, Ms. Kathy, please ignore these ignorant people and their posts. Keep blogging you have a very large and faithful following.

George

marina said...

Isn't there some misunderstanding? My husband\slave is happy when he is able to demonstrate his submission to me, his wife and mistress. For instance, when he has to kneel, naked, bend forward with his hands on his back to show his submission, nor he nor I understand this as being a punishment - it is just his satsifacitno to show his submission. We do not have a kennel, but I understand, that if we had one, he being in the kennel, would be another way for him to show his submission, and in no way would this be considered as punishment. His show of submission is a way for him to prove to his mistress his status of a slave; in this position he is content, if not happy, because it responds to his desire to show his devotion to his mistress\wife. As he says, it helps him first to prove to me and to him how serious he is in being my slave, but also it gives him a chance to ponder his situation, to deepen his understnadig of it and to cope with its implications. Obviously, this would not interfere with his profesionnal obligations (he is, like me, teaching at the local university), but such moment would take place outside the professionnal life.
So, dear Kathy, leading my husband\slave, collared, with a leash to his kennel, attach him and keep him there for some time,is NOT punishment. Punishment would be when I have to use my short, but very cutting whip on his naked behind, and then putting him in the kennel so that he can think on why he had been punished and what he should to do avoid punishment in the future, could be construed as punishment in a wider sense, but in the strict sense, whipping or spanking him sharply is punishment.
I hope you see my point.
Marina

Anonymous said...

Marina,

I see your point to some extent. However, I would submit, based on my own feelings as a submissive, that putting your husband in a kennel would not be all that different from spanking or whipping him.

My wife spanks me sometimes. I don't like the pain when she spanks me hard, so that is a punishment. Sort of. However, I do like the powerfully erotic feeling of submission I get from accepting whatever kind of "punishment" she metes out. So it is not entirely a punishment.

My wife doesn't put me in a kennel. Nor does she make me wear a collar and leash. However, if she decided to "punish" me by doing that, the effect would be similar to the effect of spanking me. It would be a punishment on one level, and a reward on another level.

I hope that makes sense.

darryl

Katheryn said...

I have to agree with Marina on this one.Many of the positions and situations I require of my slave are not punishment.But a way for him to show his devotion and respect to me as a Woman and as his Mistress.I am very demanding and have trained him using strict rules and protocols.I expect him to constantly strive to be the very best slave he can be.A kennel,leash or any subservient position no matter how uncomfortable is not punishment.His blistered ass after a severe whipping or session under my strap or cane is punishment.He not only gets to think about what he did.But it also reassures him that I care enough about his behavior and training to apply the level of discipline needed to make him as better slave.

MissAsh said...

@Marina. I get your point. Though, in re reading the post, Kathy states she uses the kennel for humiliation, punishment and for training her husband John. She chooses not to use it as an instrument of loving submission.

It makes me curious to know what constitutes loving submission for Kathy and John and whether or not he spends much time in the kennel still...

@darryl. It is not the specific act, utilizing a kennel versus a whipping, that makes it punishment. It is the reason why the act is being performed and the nature of the relationship between the couple that makes it an act of submission or a punishment, or a mix thereof.

@liz's bill. Excellent questions. These are the kinds of practical details it would be very useful to know before trying to use a kennel. I'd love to hear the answers also.

Marina said...

I appreciate very much all the comments made as a reaction to my recent message. They help, I hope, clarify some of the issues raised.

Darryl, your comments in my view very much make sense. In essence, what you are saying is this: "i am happy to show my submissiveness to my wife, as this gives me erotic feelings of submission, and when she is punishing me (in my case, through harsh spankings)that I do not like, because it is so painful, I consider it to be a deserved punishment."
But should you be put in a cage (kennel) by your wife, you would consider it also like a punishment (similar to spanking). Well, Daryll, if you hate being put in a kennel for a certain period of time by your wife, and if your wife knows this, well you can consider it as (a minor)punishment (not on the same level though as a harsh spanking, as it is not really painful, just humiliating). But as you write that you like being humiliated as this gives you erotic feelings\arousels, well, in my view, you cannot consider being put in a kennel, or having to wait on your mistress naked on your knees until she daigns addressing you, as punishment.
What you are saying regarding your attitude to punishment (spankings) is interesting, as it reflects most of the males' reactions. My husband gets aroused when he knows that punishment is coming up, erotically stimulated, but he is also experimenting feelings of fear and panic,etc. as he does not know how severe punishment will be. During punishment, i.e. when my whips cuts into his buttocks, well he could betray the whole world and event destroy it (that is the reason why I tie his hands), but when the punishment is over, after a few minutes he appreciates it the more it had hurt him. You seem to go throguh the same stages.
To summarise my opinion - as most humiliating things (even putting you in a keenel, or obeying strict rules imposed on you by your wife) contribute or help you to show your devotion to your wife and mistress, do not consider this as punishment, just as a glorous way to show your dear wife and mistress how devoted you are to her. Even if it is sometimes a bit humiliating or even unconfortable, it is still a way to give you a chance to show your submission, something that, if I understood you well, enhance your erotic feelings.

Missash, I have similar questions as you regarding some of Kathy's dealings with her John.

Katheryn - we seem to be on the same wavelength. I have no time to go into more details as I have to run to work
Marina